From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pugh v. Probstfield

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 18, 1985
705 P.2d 1158 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

84-0331C; CA A32182

Argued and submitted June 17, 1985.

Reversed and remanded with instructions September 18, 1985.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Washington County, Karl W. Freerksen, Jr., Judge Pro Tempore.

Bradley C. Grove, Forest Grove, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jeff Bennett, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and James E. Mountain, Jr., Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter judgment allowing defendant 30 days within which to file delayed direct appeal.


In this post-conviction proceeding, defendant concedes that the trial court erred in denying petitioner the right to file a delayed direct appeal of his conviction. We have concluded that the concession is correct.

Reversed and remanded with instructions to enter a judgment allowing defendant 30 days within which to file a delayed direct appeal.


Summaries of

Pugh v. Probstfield

Oregon Court of Appeals
Sep 18, 1985
705 P.2d 1158 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Pugh v. Probstfield

Case Details

Full title:PUGH, Appellant, v. PROBSTFIELD, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Sep 18, 1985

Citations

705 P.2d 1158 (Or. Ct. App. 1985)
705 P.2d 1158