From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pugh v. Norman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 6, 2018
CASE NO. 16-02075 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 6, 2018)

Opinion

CASE NO. 16-02075

02-06-2018

ROLAND PUGH, Plaintiff, v. JERRY NORMAN p/k/a NORM DANIEL, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION [#27] TO GRANT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS [#18] AND TERMINATING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXPEDITE THE CASE [#25]

This matter is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation (Doc # 27) filed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on Defendants' Norm Daniel, Paramountsong.com, and Star Tune Records ("Defendants") Motion to Dismiss (Doc # 18). Plaintiff Roland Pugh ("Pugh"), pro se, filed an Objection to the Report and Recommendation on March 8, 2017, but failed to object to a specific finding or recommendation by the Magistrate Judge. (Doc # 30) The Court ACCEPTS and ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and GRANTS Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Pugh's Motion to Expedite the case (Doc # 25) is TERMINATED AS MOOT.

The background facts of this matter are adequately set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the Court adopts them here.

The standard of review by the district court when examining a Report and Recommendation is set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 636. This Court "shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or the specified proposed findings or recommendations to which an objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). The court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. In order to preserve the right to appeal the magistrate judge's recommendation, a party must file objections to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen (14) days of service of the Report and Recommendation. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Failure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right of appeal. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985); Howard v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 932 F.2d 505, 508-09 (6th Cir. 1991); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947, 949-50 (6th Cir. 1981).

After review of the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that his findings and conclusions are correct. The Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Pugh's claims of copyright infringement, breach of contract, and piracy be dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court further agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Pugh's Motion to Expedite the case be terminated as moot.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Joe Brown's Report and Recommendation (Doc # 27) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as this Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Norm Daniel, Paramountsong.com, and Star Tune Records Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Doc # 18) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Roland Pugh's Motion to Expedite the Case (Doc # 25) is TERMINATED AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

s/Denise Page Hood

DENISE PAGE HOOD

U.S. District Judge

Sitting by Special Designation DATED: February 6, 2018


Summaries of

Pugh v. Norman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Feb 6, 2018
CASE NO. 16-02075 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 6, 2018)
Case details for

Pugh v. Norman

Case Details

Full title:ROLAND PUGH, Plaintiff, v. JERRY NORMAN p/k/a NORM DANIEL, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION

Date published: Feb 6, 2018

Citations

CASE NO. 16-02075 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 6, 2018)

Citing Cases

Kremer v. Reddit, Inc.

, report & recommendation adopted, No. 16-02075, 2018 WL 731807 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 6, 2018) (“[T]here is…