From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PUGH v. DIX

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Feb 23, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00016-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Feb. 23, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00016-KD-N.

February 23, 2010


ORDER


After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), dated January 27, 2010, is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, for reasons set forth in the report and recommendation, plaintiff's motion to amend (doc. 30) is DENIED, plaintiff's motion to amend (doc. 52) is GRANTED; all of plaintiff's claims except his claims of excessive use of force against defendants Dix and Guy and claims of unreasonable search and seizure of property against defendants Dix and Dukes, are DISMISSED without prejudice; and process shall issue upon the remaining claims against Dix, Guy and Dukes.


Summaries of

PUGH v. DIX

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
Feb 23, 2010
CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00016-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Feb. 23, 2010)
Case details for

PUGH v. DIX

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER LENARD PUGH, Plaintiff, v. RICHARD DIX, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 23, 2010

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-00016-KD-N (S.D. Ala. Feb. 23, 2010)