From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pugh v. Black

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Feb 24, 2017
Case No. 5:15-cv-02259-VEH-SGC (N.D. Ala. Feb. 24, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 5:15-cv-02259-VEH-SGC

02-24-2017

JAMES ROBERT PUGH, Plaintiff, v. LT. BLACK, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

The magistrate judge entered a report on January 19, 2017, recommending that this action, filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b). (Doc. 17). Although the magistrate judge advised the plaintiff of his right to file specific written objections within fourteen (14) days, no objections have been received by the court.

Having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation, the magistrate judge's report is hereby ADOPTED and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b), this action is due to be dismissed without prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.

A Final Judgment will be entered.

DONE this the 24th day of February, 2017.

/s/_________

VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Pugh v. Black

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION
Feb 24, 2017
Case No. 5:15-cv-02259-VEH-SGC (N.D. Ala. Feb. 24, 2017)
Case details for

Pugh v. Black

Case Details

Full title:JAMES ROBERT PUGH, Plaintiff, v. LT. BLACK, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Feb 24, 2017

Citations

Case No. 5:15-cv-02259-VEH-SGC (N.D. Ala. Feb. 24, 2017)