From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pugatch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 9, 1990
560 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 88-0738.

May 9, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Broward County; Leroy H. Moe, Judge.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Cherry Grant, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James J. Carney, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We relinquished jurisdiction to the trial court for a reconstruction of the record. The trial court has certified that such reconstruction cannot be accomplished. We find merit in appellant's argument that without a complete transcript of the trial proceedings, or an adequate reconstruction, appellate review would be futile.

Therefore, we reverse and remand this case for a new trial. See Yancey v. State, 267 So.2d 836 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972); Felton v. State, 523 So.2d 775 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and DELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Pugatch v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 9, 1990
560 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

Pugatch v. State

Case Details

Full title:JOEL PUGATCH, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 9, 1990

Citations

560 So. 2d 419 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

ADER v. STATE

However, we reverse appellant's sentence and remand for further proceedings. The State concedes that due to…