From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puff v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Dec 14, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-600 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2011)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-600

12-14-2011

WAYNE D. PUFF, Petitioner, v. M. MARTIN, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE

MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, Wayne D. Puff, an inmate currently confined at FCI Beaumont Low, proceeding pro se and in forma pampers, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, contesting the legality of his conviction.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed by either party to date.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

SIGNED at Beaumont, Texas, this 14th day of December, 2011.

____________

MARCIA A. CRONE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Puff v. Martin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Dec 14, 2011
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-600 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2011)
Case details for

Puff v. Martin

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE D. PUFF, Petitioner, v. M. MARTIN, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Date published: Dec 14, 2011

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:11-CV-600 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 14, 2011)

Citing Cases

Wiles v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.

Because the motion is pending and has not been denied, Wiles cannot show that § 2255 is inadequate or…

Alexander v. Myers

See Senegalv. Warden, 1:17-CV-806-P, 2017 WL 3881815, at *2 (W.D. La. 2017), report and recommendation…