From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puente v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 18, 2009
No. 04-08-00649-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2009)

Opinion

No. 04-08-00649-CR

Delivered and Filed: March 18, 2009. DO NOT PUBLISH.

Appealed from the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, Trial Court No. 2002-CR-6349, Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding. AFFIRMED.

Sitting: SANDEE BRYAN MARION, Justice, PHYLIS J. SPEEDLIN, Justice, MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Defendant's court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Defendant was informed of his right to review the record. Counsel provided defendant with a copy of the brief and advised him of his right to file a pro se brief. Defendant did not file a pro se brief. After reviewing the record and counsel's brief, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's judgment, and we GRANT appellate counsel's motion to withdraw. Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n. 1 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

No substitute counsel will be appointed. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 408 n. 22 (Tex.Crim.App. 2008). Should defendant wish to seek further review of this case by the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, defendant must either retain an attorney to file a petition for discretionary review or file a pro se petition for discretionary review. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed within thirty days from the date of either this opinion or the last timely motion for rehearing that is overruled by this court. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.2. Any petition for discretionary review must be filed with this court, after which it will be forwarded to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals along with the rest of the filings in this case. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.3. Any petition for discretionary review must comply with the requirements of Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 68.4.


Summaries of

Puente v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio
Mar 18, 2009
No. 04-08-00649-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2009)
Case details for

Puente v. State

Case Details

Full title:Rogelio Barbosa PUENTE, Appellant v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Fourth District, San Antonio

Date published: Mar 18, 2009

Citations

No. 04-08-00649-CR (Tex. App. Mar. 18, 2009)