From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puente v. City of Phx.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 24, 2022
No. CV-18-02778-PHX-JJT (D. Ariz. Mar. 24, 2022)

Opinion

CV-18-02778-PHX-JJT

03-24-2022

Puente, et al., Plaintiffs, v. City of Phoenix, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Honorable John J. Tuchi United States District Judge.

At issue is Defendants Benjamin Moore, Douglas McBride, Robert Scott, Christopher Turiano, Jeffrey Howell, and George Herr's Notice of Appeal (Doc. 337), in which these Defendants appeal the Court's decision (Doc. 336) denying their Motion for Summary Judgment, which included a denial of qualified immunity. So long as their appeal turns on a question of law, these Defendants were authorized to file the interlocutory appeal in this instance pursuant to Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472 U.S. 511, 530 (1985). Because the Court declines to certify that these Defendants' claim of qualified immunity is frivolous or has been waived such that they have forfeited their right to pretrial appeal, the Court “is automatically divested of jurisdiction to proceed with trial pending appeal.” Chuman v. Wright, 960 F.2d 104, 105 (9th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED staying these proceedings pending the outcome of Defendants Benjamin Moore, Douglas McBride, Robert Scott, Christopher Turiano, Jeffrey Howell, and George Herr's appeal (Doc. 337).


Summaries of

Puente v. City of Phx.

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Mar 24, 2022
No. CV-18-02778-PHX-JJT (D. Ariz. Mar. 24, 2022)
Case details for

Puente v. City of Phx.

Case Details

Full title:Puente, et al., Plaintiffs, v. City of Phoenix, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Mar 24, 2022

Citations

No. CV-18-02778-PHX-JJT (D. Ariz. Mar. 24, 2022)