From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pueblo v. Haas

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 23, 2022
979 N.W.2d 335 (Mich. 2022)

Opinion

SC: 164046 COA: 357577

09-23-2022

Carrie PUEBLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rachel HAAS, Defendant-Appellee.


Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2021 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED. The parties shall include among the issues to be briefed: (1) whether, in light of Obergefell v Hodges , 576 U.S. 644, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015), the equitable parent doctrine should be extended to provide standing to persons such as the plaintiff, who, at the time of the parties’ same-sex relationship, was not permitted by Michigan law to legally marry the defendant, and if so, (2) what the parameters of that extension should be. The time allowed for oral argument shall be 20 minutes for each side. MCR 7.314(B)(1).

Amici who appeared at the application stage are invited to file supplemental briefs amicus curiae. The Family Law Section of the State Bar of Michigan is invited to file a brief amicus curiae. Other persons or groups interested in the determination of the issues presented in this case may move the Court for permission to file briefs amicus curiae.


Summaries of

Pueblo v. Haas

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Sep 23, 2022
979 N.W.2d 335 (Mich. 2022)
Case details for

Pueblo v. Haas

Case Details

Full title:Carrie PUEBLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Rachel HAAS, Defendant-Appellee.

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Sep 23, 2022

Citations

979 N.W.2d 335 (Mich. 2022)

Citing Cases

Pueblo v. Haas

(1) whether, in light of Obergefell v Hodges, 576 U.S. 644, 135 S.Ct. 2584, 192 L.Ed.2d 609 (2015), the…