From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Puccio v. Caputo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 2000
272 A.D.2d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Argued March 10, 2000.

May 8, 2000.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated April 24, 1999, which granted the motion of the defendants PSA, a division of Pepsico, Inc., and Juan Perez for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.

Charles Berkman (Ephrem Wertenteil, New York, N.Y., of counsel), for appellants Mara Caputo and Joseph Caputo.

Russo, Scamardella D'Amato, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. (Carole R. Larsen of counsel), for appellants Kerrie Puccio and Caren Puccio.

Lewis, Johs, Avallone, Aviles Kaufman, Melville, N.Y. (Dawn C. DeSimone of counsel), for respondents.

GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, J.P., ANITA R. FLORIO, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, ROBERT W. SCHMIDT, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendants PSA, a division of Pepsico, Inc. (hereinafter PSA), and Juan Perez, for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them. PSA, the owner of a tractor trailer delivery truck, and Perez, the operator of the truck, established that the operator of the other vehicle, the defendant Lucille Caputo, was negligent as a matter of law by failing to stop at a stop sign and colliding with the side of the tractor trailer as it passed through the intersection (see, Hines v. New York City Transit Auth., 264 A.D.2d 506; Wolfson v. Milillo, 262 A.D.2d 636). In opposition, the plaintiffs, who were passengers in the Caputo vehicle, failed to submit evidence to create a triable issue of fact regarding whether Perez was in any way at fault in causing the accident (see, Perez v. Brux Cab Corp., 251 A.D.2d 157; Namisnak v. Martin, 244 A.D.2d 258).

GOLDSTEIN, J.P., FLORIO, FEUERSTEIN and SCHMIDT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Puccio v. Caputo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 8, 2000
272 A.D.2d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Puccio v. Caputo

Case Details

Full title:Kerrie Puccio, etc., et al., appellants, v. Lucille Caputo, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 8, 2000

Citations

272 A.D.2d 387 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
707 N.Y.S.2d 478

Citing Cases

Wilkins v. Davis

At the time of the collision the plaintiff, Peter Wilkins, was a passenger in a vehicle operated by the…

Shapiro v. Munoz

The defendant Raul Vivas Munoz demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by…