From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Publicity Leasing Company v. Ludwig

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1916
111 N.E. 1098 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued January 6, 1916

Decided January 25, 1916

Lamar Hardy, Corporation Counsel ( John P. O'Brien and John P. Morris of counsel), for superintendent of buildings, appellant.

Hector M. Hitchings for intervening appellants.

Walter H. Bond and Louis Gans for respondent.


Order reversed, with costs, on opinion in Southern Leasing Co. v. Ludwig ( 217 N.Y. 100). First and second questions certified answered in the negative. Third question not answered.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, CHASE, COLLIN, HOGAN, CARDOZO and SEABURY, JJ.


Summaries of

Publicity Leasing Company v. Ludwig

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jan 25, 1916
111 N.E. 1098 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Publicity Leasing Company v. Ludwig

Case Details

Full title:PUBLICITY LEASING COMPANY, Respondent, v . ALFRED LUDWIG, as…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jan 25, 1916

Citations

111 N.E. 1098 (N.Y. 1916)
111 N.E. 1098

Citing Cases

Matter of Cohn v. Bd. of Supervisors

It has been held that an action under section 51 Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law was not the…