Opinion
December 8, 1992
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (William McCooe, J.).
Petitioner's contention that its application for a stay of arbitration should be deemed timely because respondent's demand for arbitration was defective in that it did not contain his correct address, was properly rejected by the IAS Court on the ground that the demand did include the address of respondent's attorney (Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. [Granelli], 37 A.D.2d 113).
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Milonas, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.