From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Public Admr. v. Equitable Life Assurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

November 16, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita R. Florio, J.).


Structure Tone was the general contractor on a construction project at the midtown Manhattan offices of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton Garrison. Coyne subcontracted to do the electrical work, and plaintiff's decedent, a plasterer, was fatally injured when he came in contact with a live wire.

By the terms of the electrical subcontract, Coyne was to furnish a certificate that it was carrying comprehensive general liability insurance, inter alia, at specified limits, and it further agreed to indemnify and hold Structure Tone harmless against all liability claims. Structure Tone's purported cross claim alleges Coyne's breach of that subcontractual obligation by failing to provide comprehensive general liability coverage for Structure Tone. However, there is in the record a broker's certificate of insurance confirming the issuance of liability coverage to Coyne by Zurich Insurance Company at the appropriate limits. This certificate also bears a notation that Structure Tone is an "ADD'L INSURED", although the policy itself contains no endorsement extending coverage to Structure Tone.

Earlier this year, we affirmed a dismissal of Structure Tone's declaratory judgment action against Zurich under this policy (Structure Tone v Zurich Ins. Co., 193 A.D.2d 554). But that dismissal was based solely on Structure Tone's failure to give Zurich timely notice of the claim.

The subcontract is unambiguous as to Coyne's obligations to obtain insurance in its own right, and to hold Structure Tone harmless. There is no language in the subcontract obligating Coyne additionally to "provide insurance covering Structure Tone" (see, Bishop v Port Auth., 170 A.D.2d 565, lv denied 78 N.Y.2d 858; cf., Kinney v Lisk Co., 76 N.Y.2d 215), notwithstanding the dubious reference to Structure Tone, in the certificate of insurance, as an "ADD'L INSURED".

It was error to permit an amended pleading under such circumstances, which would allow the issue of insurance coverage to be brought before the triers of fact (Transamerica Ins. Co. v Tolis Inn, 129 A.D.2d 512).

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.


Summaries of

Public Admr. v. Equitable Life Assurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 16, 1993
198 A.D.2d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Public Admr. v. Equitable Life Assurance

Case Details

Full title:PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR OF BRONX COUNTY, as Administrator of the Estate of…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1993

Citations

198 A.D.2d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
603 N.Y.S.2d 830

Citing Cases

Trapani v. 10 Arial Way Associates

A provision in a construction contract cannot be interpreted as requiring the procurement of additional…

M&M Realty of N.Y., LLC v. Burlington Ins. Co.

In any event, there is no requirement in the agreement that its enforceability was conditioned upon L&M's…