From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Public Administrator, Kings Cty. v. San Diego

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2000
268 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)

Opinion

Submitted December 2, 1999

January 27, 2000

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, in which the Public Administrator, Kings County, was substituted as the plaintiff on behalf of the estate of Johnny Vigo, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (I. Aronin, J.), dated December 22, 1998, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Smith Mazure Director Wilkins Young Yagerman Tarallo, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Steven I. Brizel of counsel), for appellant.

Hesterberg Keller, P.C., New York, N.Y. (Donald R. Billett of counsel), for respondent.

LAWRENCE J. BRACKEN, J.P., DANIEL W. JOY, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, ANITA R. FLORIO, JJ.


DECISION ORDER

ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

There are issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment ( see, Tishman v. City of New York, 30 A.D.2d 854, affd 25 N.Y.2d 978).

BRACKEN, J.P., JOY, GOLDSTEIN, and FLORIO, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Public Administrator, Kings Cty. v. San Diego

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 27, 2000
268 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
Case details for

Public Administrator, Kings Cty. v. San Diego

Case Details

Full title:PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR, KINGS COUNTY, etc., respondent, v. DANIEL SAN DIEGO…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 27, 2000

Citations

268 A.D.2d 417 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000)
701 N.Y.S.2d 633