From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

PU v. SHAHZAD

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 2008
21 Misc. 3d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 2008)

Opinion

October 7, 2008.


Attorney and Client — Frivolous Conduct. Rules of Chief Administrator of Courts — 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (a) (Costs, sanctions; frivolous conduct).


Summaries of

PU v. SHAHZAD

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Oct 7, 2008
21 Misc. 3d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 2008)
Case details for

PU v. SHAHZAD

Case Details

Full title:Pu v. Shahzad

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Oct 7, 2008

Citations

21 Misc. 3d 129 (N.Y. App. Term 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 51997

Citing Cases

PU v. MITSOPOULOS

Under 22 NYCRR 130-1.1, sanctions are warranted when "any party or attorney engages in frivolous conduct,"…