From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pu v. Golden City Rest. Huang's

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 3, 2021
1:21-cv-05035-ALC-SLC (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-cv-05035-ALC-SLC

12-03-2021

DIEGO PU, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GOLDEN CITY RESTAURANT HUANG'S INC. D/B/A GOLDEN CITY, AND LEE WAH. Defendants.


JUDGMENT

Andrew L. Carter, Jr. United States District Judge.

On 12/3/2021 Plaintiff filed a notice of acceptance of offer of judgment pursuant to Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

NOW, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: That the Plaintiff DIEGO PU, have judgment against Defendants GOLDEN CITY RESTAURANT HUANG'S INC. (D/B/ A GOLDEN CITY), AND LEE WAH (collectively “Defendants”), jointly and severally, in the amount of $17, 000.00, (Seventeen Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents) which is inclusive of interest, attorneys' fees and costs. See Mei Xing Yu v. Hasaki Restaurant, Inc., 944 F.3d 395, 410 (2d Cir. 2019).

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Pu v. Golden City Rest. Huang's

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 3, 2021
1:21-cv-05035-ALC-SLC (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2021)
Case details for

Pu v. Golden City Rest. Huang's

Case Details

Full title:DIEGO PU, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 3, 2021

Citations

1:21-cv-05035-ALC-SLC (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2021)