P.T.R. v. B.P.H.

Full title: P.T.R., Respondent, v. B.P.H., Appellant.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Jan 22, 2019

583 S.W.3d 67 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

ED 106298

01-22-2019

P.T.R., Respondent, v. B.P.H., Appellant.

Carter C. Law, 141 N Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant. Katherine Wessling, 539 N. Grand, Suite 400, St. Louis, MO 63103, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Carter C. Law, 141 N Meramec Avenue, Suite 314, St. Louis, MO 63105, for appellant.

Katherine Wessling, 539 N. Grand, Suite 400, St. Louis, MO 63103, for respondent.

Before: Kurt S. Odenwald, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Jr., J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. B.P.H. appeals from the denial of his Rule 78.01 motion after the trial court entered judgment on P.T.R.’s petition for an order of protection. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order. The decision is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).