From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pryor v. Scott

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Dec 2, 1958
146 A.2d 569 (D.C. 1958)

Opinion

No. 2256.

Argued September 29, 1958.

Decided December 2, 1958.

APPEAL FROM MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, CIVIL DIVISION, MARY C. BARLOW, J.

George B. Parks, Washington, D.C., with whom Robert A. Harris, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

J. Lawrence Hall, Washington, D.C., for appellees.

Before ROVER, Chief Judge, and HOOD and QUINN, Associate Judges.


Appellant's automobile while proceeding through an uncontrolled street intersection was struck on its right rear side by appellee's automobile. The trial court found appellee was negligent, but denied recovery to appellant because of contributory negligence on his part.

This appeal attacks the finding of contributory negligence. Appellant asserts that because his automobile was first in the intersection he had the right of way. He relies on Bland v. Hershey, 60 App.D.C. 226, 50 F.2d 991, but that case holds that right of way is relative and not absolute. Appellant's testimony was that when he reached the intersection he saw appellee's car approaching on his right, 20, 30 or 40 feet away, but nevertheless he proceeded into the intersection without slowing down. We cannot say this testimony would not support a finding of contributory negligence.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Pryor v. Scott

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Dec 2, 1958
146 A.2d 569 (D.C. 1958)
Case details for

Pryor v. Scott

Case Details

Full title:Charles PRYOR, Appellant, v. Harry E. SCOTT, Jr., and Capitol Cab…

Court:Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Date published: Dec 2, 1958

Citations

146 A.2d 569 (D.C. 1958)