From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pryor v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 28, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2635 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-2635 FCD DAD P.

May 28, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On April 10, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 10, 2008, are adopted in full; and

2. Respondent's September 26, 2007 motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the statute of limitations is granted.


Summaries of

Pryor v. Horel

United States District Court, E.D. California
May 28, 2008
No. CIV S-06-2635 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2008)
Case details for

Pryor v. Horel

Case Details

Full title:JAMES PRYOR, Petitioner, v. ROBERT A. HOREL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: May 28, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-2635 FCD DAD P (E.D. Cal. May. 28, 2008)