From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pryer v. Henderson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 18, 1959
21 Misc. 2d 256 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

December 18, 1959

Appeal from the District Court of the County of Nassau, KATHLEEN M. KANE, J.

Doran Goerlich ( Harold L. Goerlich of counsel), for appellant.

Gelfand Shedler ( Burton W. Stone of counsel), for respondents.


The Nassau County District Court is a court not of record (Judiciary Law, § 2) and therefore did not have power to order a discovery and inspection pursuant to the provisions of section 324 of the Civil Practice Act; and such power is not specifically conferred on it by any provision of the Nassau County District Court Act.

The order should be unanimously reversed upon the law, with $10 costs to defendant and motion denied. The court was without power to make the order appealed from.

Concur — PETTE, DI GIOVANNA and BROWN, JJ.

Order reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Pryer v. Henderson

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Dec 18, 1959
21 Misc. 2d 256 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Pryer v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA PRYER et al., Infants, by Their Guardian ad Litem, CHARLES PRYER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Dec 18, 1959

Citations

21 Misc. 2d 256 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
195 N.Y.S.2d 44

Citing Cases

Soblick v. Schwarzbrott

The motion to preclude is denied. The motion for discovery and inspection: Defendant cites Pryer v. Henderson…