Opinion
No. 20220039
03-03-2022
In the INTEREST OF R.S. William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v. R.S., Respondent and Appellant
Leo A. Ryan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jamestown, ND for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Leo A. Ryan, Special Assistant Attorney General, Jamestown, ND for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.
Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.
Per Curiam.
[¶1] R.S. appeals from a district court's continuing treatment order. He argues the evidence does not support the court's findings that he is a mentally ill individual requiring treatment. We conclude the court's findings are not clearly erroneous. See Interest of Doe , 2019 ND 23, ¶ 4, 921 N.W.2d 403 (the more probing clearly erroneous standard of review applies to factual findings made by the district court in N.D.C.C. ch. 25-03.1 civil commitment proceedings). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Gerald W. VandeWalle
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Jerod E. Tufte