From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pryatel v. R.S. (In re R.S.)

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Mar 19, 2020
2020 N.D. 60 (N.D. 2020)

Opinion

No. 20200045

03-19-2020

In the INTEREST OF R.S. William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v. R.S., Respondent and Appellant

Leo A. Ryan, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief. Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.


Leo A. Ryan, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee; submitted on brief.

Andrew Marquart, Fargo, ND, for respondent and appellant; submitted on brief.

Per Curiam.

[¶1] R.S. appeals from the district court’s order granting the request for continuing treatment. R.S. argues that there lacked clear and convincing evidence to support he was mentally ill and required treatment as mandated by N.D.C.C. § 25-03.1-02. We conclude the district court’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence and are not clearly erroneous. We affirm under N.D.R.App.35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.

Gerald W. VandeWalle

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers

Jerod E. Tufte


Summaries of

Pryatel v. R.S. (In re R.S.)

SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
Mar 19, 2020
2020 N.D. 60 (N.D. 2020)
Case details for

Pryatel v. R.S. (In re R.S.)

Case Details

Full title:In the Interest of R.S. William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee v…

Court:SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

Date published: Mar 19, 2020

Citations

2020 N.D. 60 (N.D. 2020)
940 N.W.2d 602