From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruitt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Apr 3, 2001
41 S.W.3d 55 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED78014

Order Filed: April 3, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS, HONORABLE EVELYN M. BAKER.

Douglas R. Hoff, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John Munson Morris, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Stephanie Morrell, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

Before: LAWRENCE E. MOONEY, P.J., PAUL J. SIMON and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.



ORDER


Movant, Ricky L. Pruitt, appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b)(2).


Summaries of

Pruitt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Apr 3, 2001
41 S.W.3d 55 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Pruitt v. State

Case Details

Full title:RICKY LEE PRUITT, Movant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Apr 3, 2001

Citations

41 S.W.3d 55 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)