From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruitt v. Atwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02542-LTB (D. Colo. Nov. 19, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02542-BNB

11-19-2012

DeANDRE D. PRUITT, Plaintiff, v. SGT. MIKE ATWOOD, SGT. PARTIN, #530297, R.N. DEBERKOW, #530297, C/O JONES, and SGT. KNUDTON, #530297, Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Plaintiff, DeAndre D. Pruitt, is in the custody of the Colorado Department of Corrections and currently is incarcerated at the San Carlos Correctional Facility in Pueblo, Colorado. Mr. Pruitt, acting pro se, initiated this action by filing a Prisoner Complaint and a Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. In an order entered on October 11, 2012, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland granted Mr. Pruitt leave to proceed pursuant to § 1915 and instructed him to pay a $2.00 initial partial filing fee. Magistrate Judge Boland also instructed Mr. Pruitt that if he is unable to pay the initial partial filing fee he must file a current certified account statement that shows cause why he has no assets and no means by which to pay the fee.

Magistrate Judge Boland warned Mr. Pruitt that the action would be dismissed without further notice if either he failed to pay the initial partial fee within thirty days or in the alternative he failed to show cause why he is unable to do so.

Mr. Pruitt now has failed to communicate with the Court within the time allowed. The action will be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply because Mr. Pruitt has failed either to pay the $2.00 initial partial filing fee or to show cause as required under § 1915 why he is unable to do so.

Finally, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order is not taken in good faith, and, therefore, in forma pauperis status will be denied for the purpose of appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). If Mr. Pruitt files a notice of appeal he must also pay the full $455 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit within thirty days in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Complaint and action are dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure either to pay the initial partial filing fee or in the alternative to show cause. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal is denied.

DATED at Denver, Colorado, this 19th day of November, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

LEWIS T. BABCOCK, Senior Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Pruitt v. Atwood

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Nov 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-02542-LTB (D. Colo. Nov. 19, 2012)
Case details for

Pruitt v. Atwood

Case Details

Full title:DeANDRE D. PRUITT, Plaintiff, v. SGT. MIKE ATWOOD, SGT. PARTIN, #530297…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Nov 19, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-02542-LTB (D. Colo. Nov. 19, 2012)