From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Houser

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 24, 2024
No. CV-24-02706-PHX-KML (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024)

Opinion

CV-24-02706-PHX-KML

10-24-2024

Prudential Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff, v. Dylan Houser, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Honorable Krissa M. Lanham United States District Judge

Plaintiff Prudential Insurance Company states it “has limited information on the competence of Defendant Dylan Houser.” (Doc. 6 at 1.) Prudential plans to attempt service of process on Dylan by sending a process server to the State Hospital. (Doc. 6 at 2.) Without addressing whether that service will be proper, Prudential may attempt such service.

Prudential states it “named Joyce Houser as a defendant . . . in her sole capacity as guardian of minor J.D.” (Doc. 6 at 2.) Despite that, Prudential then states it has “named both Joyce Houser and J.D. as defendants.” (Doc. 6 at 2.) Given that she is not being named in any capacity other than as guardian of J.D., Joyce Houser will not be listed as a separate defendant.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED Prudential shall submit, and the Clerk of Court shall issue, new summons in the names of 1) Dylan Houser; and 2) Joyce Houser, solely in her capacity as guardian of J.D.


Summaries of

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Houser

United States District Court, District of Arizona
Oct 24, 2024
No. CV-24-02706-PHX-KML (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Prudential Ins. Co. of Am. v. Houser

Case Details

Full title:Prudential Insurance Company of America, Plaintiff, v. Dylan Houser, et…

Court:United States District Court, District of Arizona

Date published: Oct 24, 2024

Citations

No. CV-24-02706-PHX-KML (D. Ariz. Oct. 24, 2024)