From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Pruden v. Bruce

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 11, 2015
129 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)

Opinion

2015-06-11

Karen L. PRUDEN, as Attorney–In–Fact for Ericka K. Spinner, Incapacitated, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Jeffrey N. BRUCE, M.D., et al., Defendants, Ira R. Abbott, III, M.D., et al., Defendants–Appellants.

Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, Valhalla (Adonaid C. Medina of counsel), for appellants. Duffy & Duffy, PLLC, Uniondale (James N. LiCalzi of counsel), for respondent.



Kaufman, Borgeest & Ryan, LLP, Valhalla (Adonaid C. Medina of counsel), for appellants. Duffy & Duffy, PLLC, Uniondale (James N. LiCalzi of counsel), for respondent.
TOM, J.P., RENWICK, ANDRIAS, MANZANET–DANIELS, KAPNICK, JJ.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Douglas E. McKeon, J.), entered on or about May 31, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, sua sponte, appointed plaintiff Karen Pruden to act as guardian ad litem of Ericka Spinner, nunc pro tunc, pursuant to CPLR 1202, and denied the motion of defendants Ira R. Abbott, III, M.D. and Montefiore Medical Center (collectively Montefiore) to dismiss the complaint as against them pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(3), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

In 2009, the 21–year–old Spinner was diagnosed with a benign brain tumor. On January 13, 2010, she executed a durable power of attorney in which she designated Pruden, her mother, to serve as her attorney-in-fact and as her guardian, should guardianship proceedings become necessary. Spinner's signature was acknowledged by her physician and notarized by a witness. Acting pursuant to powers given to her by the validly executed power of attorney ( seeGeneral Obligations Law § 5–1501, et seq.), Pruden commenced this medical malpractice action in December 2011.

In support of their motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(3), Montefiore asserted that Spinner was not competent to execute the power of attorney. A party's competence to enter into a transaction is presumed, even if the party suffers from a condition affecting cognitive function, and “the party asserting incapacity bears the burden of proof” ( Er–Loom Realty, LLC v. Prelosh Realty, LLC, 77 A.D.3d 546, 548, 909 N.Y.S.2d 714 [1st Dept.2010], lv. denied 16 N.Y.3d 710, 2011 WL 1584722 [2011]; see Matter of Mildred M.J., 43 A.D.3d 1391, 844 N.Y.S.2d 539 [4th Dept.2007]; Feiden v. Feiden, 151 A.D.2d 889, 890, 542 N.Y.S.2d 860 [3d Dept.1989] ). Since Montefiore failed to submit any evidence concerning Spinner's competence at the time she executed the power of attorney, other than the document itself, it did not meet its initial burden in support of the motion, and the burden did not shift to plaintiff to demonstrate competency.

Under the circumstances presented, where Spinner has been rendered quadriplegic and unable to communicate, the court acted within its discretion in appointing Pruden to be Spinner's guardian ad litem without a hearing (CPLR 1202[a] ).

We have considered Montefiore's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Pruden v. Bruce

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Jun 11, 2015
129 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
Case details for

Pruden v. Bruce

Case Details

Full title:Karen L. PRUDEN, as Attorney–In–Fact for Ericka K. Spinner, Incapacitated…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Jun 11, 2015

Citations

129 A.D.3d 506 (N.Y. App. Div. 2015)
129 A.D.3d 506
2015 N.Y. Slip Op. 4946

Citing Cases

In re Delaney

"Capacity" is defined as the "ability to comprehend the nature and consequences of the act of executing and…

Vasilatos v. Dzamba

Plaintiff was born in 1986 and was 28 years old when she commenced this action. In general, a party's…