From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proxmire v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jan 5, 2021
Case No. 8:19-cv-792-T-AEP (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2021)

Opinion

Case No. 8:19-cv-792-T-AEP

01-05-2021

DONNA PROXMIRE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 22). By the motion, Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees in the amount of $4,309.70 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act ("EAJA"), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. On September 29, 2020, this Court entered an Order reversing and remanding the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings (Doc. 20). Thereafter, the Clerk entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff (Doc. 21). As the prevailing party, Plaintiff now requests an award of attorney's fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A); cf. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300-02 (1993) (concluding that a party who wins a sentence-four remand order under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is a prevailing party).

The Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief. After issuance of an order awarding EAJA fees, however, the United States Department of the Treasury will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If Plaintiff has no discernable federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. For the reasons set out in Plaintiff's motion, therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 22) is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of $4,309.70. Unless the Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes a federal debt, the government must pay the fees to Plaintiff's counsel in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment of fees (Doc. 22-2).

DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on this 5th day of January, 2021.

/s/_________

ANTHONY E. PORCELLI

United States Magistrate Judge cc: Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Proxmire v. Saul

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
Jan 5, 2021
Case No. 8:19-cv-792-T-AEP (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2021)
Case details for

Proxmire v. Saul

Case Details

Full title:DONNA PROXMIRE, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Date published: Jan 5, 2021

Citations

Case No. 8:19-cv-792-T-AEP (M.D. Fla. Jan. 5, 2021)