From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Providence Saia v. Misrahi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1987
129 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

April 13, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County, Scholnick, J., Bernstein, J.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Where, as here, a theory of liability submitted to the jury is that the appellant itself created a dangerous condition which led to the plaintiff Providence Saia's injury, notice is not an essential part of the cause of action (see, Lewis v Metropolitan Transp. Auth., 64 N.Y.2d 670, affg 99 A.D.2d 246, 249-250, on opn at App. Div.; Safran v Man-Dell Stores, 106 A.D.2d 560, 562; 1 N.Y. PJI 2d, at 274). Therefore, given the facts of this case, the plaintiffs sufficiently established a prima facie case of negligence against the appellant for the trial court to submit this case to the jury (see, Akins v Glens Falls City School Dist., 53 N.Y.2d 325, 333, rearg denied 54 N.Y.2d 831; Basso v Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 241). Bracken, J.P., Brown, Niehoff and Kooper, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Providence Saia v. Misrahi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 13, 1987
129 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Providence Saia v. Misrahi

Case Details

Full title:PROVIDENCE SAIA et al., Respondents, v. JOSEPH MISRAHI, Doing Business as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 13, 1987

Citations

129 A.D.2d 621 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
514 N.Y.S.2d 256

Citing Cases

Peralta v. Henriquez

Therefore, the plaintiff sufficiently established a prima facie case of negligence against the appellants for…

McDonough v. Celebrity Cruises, Inc.

This is an important distinction. See Lee, 916 F. Supp. at 303 n. 2 ("In a maritime case, of course, the…