Opinion
4:24-cv-00112 JM
02-22-2024
KEVIN WAYNE PROVENCIO #269126 PLAINTIFF v. JOE BIDEN, President DEFENDANT
ORDER
Kevin Wayne Provencio, an inmate at the Pulaski County Detention Facility, has filed a pro se complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Doc. 1) and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 4). Because a district court has the inherent authority to dismiss a case without a motion by either party for failure to state a claim, Provencio's IFP (Doc. 4) is denied as moot and his complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See Smith v. Boyd, 945 F.2d 1041, 1043 (8th Cir. 1991).
Provencio alleges that his human rights have been violated, that he is a victim of human trafficking, and that he is enslaved by the existence of his birth certificate. (Doc. 1 at 2-5). Provencio asks President Biden to “correct the wrong the country is doing . . . because of greed of the bonds of our birth certificates.” (Id. at 4). An action is frivolous if its allegations are “fanciful . . . fantastic or delusional,” its “factual contentions are clearly baseless,” or it is “based on an indisputably meritless legal theory.” Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992); Nietzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327-29 (1989). A “finding of frivolousness is appropriate when the facts alleged rise to the level of the irrational or the wholly incredible.” Denton, 504 U.S. at 33. Provencio's allegations are fanciful and unfounded and are dismissed without prejudice.
The Court recommend that this dismissal be counted as a strike within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). An in forma pauperis appeal would not be taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.