From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prout v. Mirsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1926
216 App. Div. 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)

Opinion

April, 1926.


Judgment of the City Court of New Rochelle reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs, on the ground that there is no evidence justifying a recovery. Kelly, P.J., Rich, Jaycox, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Prout v. Mirsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1926
216 App. Div. 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)
Case details for

Prout v. Mirsky

Case Details

Full title:ANITA N. PROUT, Respondent, v. MORRIS MIRSKY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1926

Citations

216 App. Div. 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1926)