From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company

Supreme Court of California.Department Two
Jan 24, 1921
184 Cal. 809 (Cal. 1921)

Opinion

L. A. No. 6394.L. A. No. 6426.L. A. No. 6625.

January 24, 1921.

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Ventura County. Merle J. Rogers, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are identical with those stated in the opinion in Runkle v. Southern Pacific Milling Co., ante, p. 714.

Charles F. Blackstock for Appellant.

Robert M. Clarke, Henry L. Knoop, I.W. Stewart, A.D. Shaw and W.W. Hindman for Respondents.


Although they are three separate and independent suits, the three above-mentioned cases are identical in their facts with the facts of the case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific Milling Co., ante, p. 714, [195 P. 398]. The points urged for a reversal in these cases by appellant, Southern Pacific Milling Company, are the same as those which were presented in said case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific Milling Co., and, therefore, what we have said in the latter case sufficiently disposes of the points made. Upon the authority of that case the judgments in these three cases are affirmed.


Summaries of

Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company

Supreme Court of California.Department Two
Jan 24, 1921
184 Cal. 809 (Cal. 1921)
Case details for

Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company

Case Details

Full title:C. J. PROUD, Respondent, v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC MILLING COMPANY (a…

Court:Supreme Court of California.Department Two

Date published: Jan 24, 1921

Citations

184 Cal. 809 (Cal. 1921)
195 P. 401