From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Protsman v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 12, 2021
2:21-cv-1034 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-1034 CKD P

08-12-2021

EUGENE RED PROTSMAN, Plaintiff, v. E. SMITH, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff has filed a motion for extension of time to file an amended complaint. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 9) is granted; and

2. Plaintiff is granted until September 15, 2021 to file an amended complaint. Failure to file an amended complaint by that date will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.


Summaries of

Protsman v. Smith

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Aug 12, 2021
2:21-cv-1034 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)
Case details for

Protsman v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:EUGENE RED PROTSMAN, Plaintiff, v. E. SMITH, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 12, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-1034 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2021)