From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prosperity Co. v. Am. Laundry Mach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1947
74 N.E.2d 188 (N.Y. 1947)

Summary

In Prosperity Co. v. American Laundry Mach. Co. (297 N.Y. 486) the Court of Appeals held a New York corporation, which had agreed to arbitrate under the laws of Ohio, subject to an award made by an arbitrator appointed by an Ohio court, even though the New York corporation had not been served in Ohio with notice of the appointment as required by Ohio's arbitration statute.

Summary of this case from Matter of Bauer

Opinion

Argued May 14, 1947

Decided May 29, 1947

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, KIMBALL, J.

Victor Levine for appellant.

Basil B. Aylesworth for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., CONWAY, DESMOND, THACHER, DYE and FULD, JJ. Taking no part: LEWIS, J.


Summaries of

Prosperity Co. v. Am. Laundry Mach

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 29, 1947
74 N.E.2d 188 (N.Y. 1947)

In Prosperity Co. v. American Laundry Mach. Co. (297 N.Y. 486) the Court of Appeals held a New York corporation, which had agreed to arbitrate under the laws of Ohio, subject to an award made by an arbitrator appointed by an Ohio court, even though the New York corporation had not been served in Ohio with notice of the appointment as required by Ohio's arbitration statute.

Summary of this case from Matter of Bauer
Case details for

Prosperity Co. v. Am. Laundry Mach

Case Details

Full title:PROSPERITY COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. AMERICAN LAUNDRY MACHINERY…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 29, 1947

Citations

74 N.E.2d 188 (N.Y. 1947)
74 N.E.2d 188

Citing Cases

Berner v. United Airlines

This situation frequently has arisen in cases involving agreements to arbitrate. The principles therein…

Berner v. United Airlines

This situation frequently has arisen in cases involving agreements to arbitrate. The principles therein…