From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proprietary Nutritionals, Inc. v. Imaginetix, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Jan 12, 2007
Civil 06CV2091-L(POR) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2007)

Opinion


PROPRIETARY NUTRITIONALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. IMAGINETIX, INC., et al., Defendants, AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM Civil No. 06CV2091-L(POR) United States District Court, S.D. California. January 12, 2007

          ORDER STRIKING DOCUMENT FROM THE RECORD

          M. JAMES LORENZ, District Judge.

         On January 11, 2007, the parties electronically filed a Joint Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants Thomas Hall and Frank Sajovic's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 26.). Included in this docket entry, and not separated as an attachment, is [Proposed] Order Granting Joint Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants Thomas Hall and Frank Sajovic's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 26, pages 10-11.) The proposed order is rejected and stricken from the record because it fails to comply with the Electronic Case Filing Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual ("E-Filing Manual") § 2(h) (Proposed Orders and Orders). The Clerk of the Court is instructed to STRIKE FROM THE RECORD the [Proposed] Order Granting Joint Motion to Continue Hearing on Defendants Thomas Hall and Frank Sajovic's Motion to Dismiss, filed January 11, 2007 (Docket No. 26, pages 10-11).

         IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Proprietary Nutritionals, Inc. v. Imaginetix, Inc.

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California
Jan 12, 2007
Civil 06CV2091-L(POR) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2007)
Case details for

Proprietary Nutritionals, Inc. v. Imaginetix, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PROPRIETARY NUTRITIONALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. IMAGINETIX, INC., et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, S.D. California

Date published: Jan 12, 2007

Citations

Civil 06CV2091-L(POR) (S.D. Cal. Jan. 12, 2007)