From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prophet v. Supreme Court

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 2, 2008
302 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-15170.

Submitted November 24, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed December 2, 2008.

Joseph Danny Prophet, Jamestown, CA, for Petitioner-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Morrison C. England, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-06-02160-MCE.

Before: ALARCÓN, LEAVY, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


California state prisoner Joseph Danny Prophet appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition for failure to exhaust state remedies. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253, and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed the action because Prophet did not exhaust his state court remedies before filing a petition in the district court. See Davis v. Silva, 511 F.3d 1005, 1008 (9th Cir. 2008).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Prophet v. Supreme Court

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 2, 2008
302 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Prophet v. Supreme Court

Case Details

Full title:Joseph Danny PROPHET, Petitioner-Appellant, v. SUPREME COURT of State OF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 2, 2008

Citations

302 F. App'x 658 (9th Cir. 2008)