Opinion
(14630)
Decided October 30, 1992
The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 18 [AC 10367], is granted, limited to the following question:
"Under the facts of this case, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the planning and zoning commission did not have the authority to condition its approval of the plaintiff's subdivision application on the plaintiff's widening of a public highway abutting the proposed subdivision?"
Richard S. Conti, in support of the petition.
Edward S. Hyman, in opposition.