From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proost v. Vill. of Carleton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 2, 2017
Case No. 17-11133 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 2, 2017)

Opinion

Case No. 17-11133

06-02-2017

DEANNA M. PROOST, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF CARLETON, Defendant.


ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL

Plaintiff Deanna M. Proost recently filed a two-count complaint in this court alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act in Count I and violations of Michigan's Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act ("ELCRA") in Count II.

Although Count I, arising under federal law, is cognizable in this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the allegations presented in Count II are based solely on state law. The parties to this action are not diverse. Therefore, this court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claim to avoid jury confusion. See 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c); United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, 282 U.S. 715 (1966); Padilla v. City of Saginaw, 867 F. Supp. 1309 (E.D. Mich. 1994).

ORDER

It is hereby ORDERED that Count II is DISMISSED.

s/John Corbett O'Meara

United States District Judge Date: June 2, 2017

I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on this date, June 2, 2017, using the ECF system.

s/William Barkholz

Case Manager


Summaries of

Proost v. Vill. of Carleton

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Jun 2, 2017
Case No. 17-11133 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 2, 2017)
Case details for

Proost v. Vill. of Carleton

Case Details

Full title:DEANNA M. PROOST, Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF CARLETON, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

Date published: Jun 2, 2017

Citations

Case No. 17-11133 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 2, 2017)