From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Promos Techs. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 6, 2019
2018-2067 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 6, 2019)

Opinion

2018-2067

09-06-2019

PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., Appellee

CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, TechKnowledge Law Group LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JERRY CHEN. NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by PAUL ANDERSON, CHETAN BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JOSEPH PALYS.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-00037.

JUDGMENT

CRAIG R. KAUFMAN, TechKnowledge Law Group LLP, Redwood City, CA, argued for appellant. Also represented by JERRY CHEN. NAVEEN MODI, Paul Hastings LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by PAUL ANDERSON, CHETAN BANSAL, STEPHEN BLAKE KINNAIRD, JOSEPH PALYS. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT September 6, 2019

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court


Summaries of

Promos Techs. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 6, 2019
2018-2067 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 6, 2019)
Case details for

Promos Techs. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PROMOS TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 6, 2019

Citations

2018-2067 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 6, 2019)