From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Prometheus v. Everest

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 23, 2008
279 F. App'x 560 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 06-16426.

May 23, 2008.

David T. Dibiase, Esq., Rogers Wells, Richard P. Tricker, Esq., Anderson McPharlin Conners, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Bruce Adelstein, Esq., Law Offices of Bruce Adelstein, Dennis A. Kendig, Esq., Daniel L. Germain, Esq., Kendig Law Firm, Encino, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

No Appearance Bruce Adelstein, Esq.

D.C. No. CV-06-02751-WHA, Northern District of California, San Francisco.

Before: THOMPSON and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges, and HAYES, District Judge.

The Honorable William Q. Hayes, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.


ORDER

The Plaintiffs-Appellants' Conditional Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED. The memorandum disposition filed April 8, 2008, dismissing the case, is withdrawn. Submission of this case is deferred pending disposition in Perretta v. Prometheus Development Co., No. 06-15526.


Summaries of

Prometheus v. Everest

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
May 23, 2008
279 F. App'x 560 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Prometheus v. Everest

Case Details

Full title:PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.; et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: May 23, 2008

Citations

279 F. App'x 560 (9th Cir. 2008)