From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Promed Orthocare Supply, Inc. v. Geico Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 and 13 Judicial Dist.
May 22, 2014
43 Misc. 3d 143 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)

Opinion

No. 2012–1059QC.

2014-05-22

PROMED ORTHOCARE SUPPLY, INC. as Assignee of SOLOMON LIKHTIGER, Respondent, v. GEICO INS. CO., Appellant.


Present PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ.

Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Queens County (Carmen R. Velasquez, J.), entered February 16, 2012. The order, insofar as appealed from, upon denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, made, in effect, CPLR 3212(g) findings in plaintiff's favor, and denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

ORDERED that the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed, with $25 costs.

For the reasons stated in Promed Durable Equip., Inc. as Assignee of Keisha Diaz v. GEICO Ins. (––– Misc.3d ––––, 2014 N.Y. Slip Op ______ [Appeal No.2012–95 K C], decided herewith), the order, insofar as appealed from, is affirmed.

PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and SOLOMON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Promed Orthocare Supply, Inc. v. Geico Ins. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 and 13 Judicial Dist.
May 22, 2014
43 Misc. 3d 143 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)
Case details for

Promed Orthocare Supply, Inc. v. Geico Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:PROMED ORTHOCARE SUPPLY, INC. as Assignee of SOLOMON LIKHTIGER…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Dept., 2, 11 and 13 Judicial Dist.

Date published: May 22, 2014

Citations

43 Misc. 3d 143 (N.Y. App. Term 2014)
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 50878
993 N.Y.S.2d 645