Prolitec, Inc. v. Scentair Techs., Inc.

Full title: PROLITEC, INC., Appellant v. SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 9, 2015

607 F. App'x 992 (Fed. Cir. 2015)

Opinion

2015-1017

06-09-2015

PROLITEC, INC., Appellant v. SCENTAIR TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee

ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. DEREK MCCORQUINDALE; CORY C. BELL, Boston, MA. JOSHUA B. POND, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES, Winston-Salem, NC; DAVID CLAY HOLLOWAY, TIFFANY L. WILLIAMS, Atlanta, GA.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013-00180.

JUDGMENT

ERIKA ARNER, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, Reston, VA, argued for appellant. Also represented by J. DEREK MCCORQUINDALE; CORY C. BELL, Boston, MA. JOSHUA B. POND, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by ADAM HOWARD CHARNES, Winston-Salem, NC; DAVID CLAY HOLLOWAY, TIFFANY L. WILLIAMS, Atlanta, GA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and WALLACH, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT June 9, 2015

Date

/s/ Daniel E. O'Toole

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court