From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Progressive Specialty Ins. Co. v. Seng Jin Jang

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6930 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)

Opinion

No. 2020-02936 Index No. 706316/19

12-07-2022

In the Matter of Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Respondent, v. Seng Jin Jang, Appellant.

Law Offices of Andrew Park, P.C., New York, NY (Jusun Yook of counsel), for appellant. Jennifer S. Adams, Yonkers, NY (Michael A. Zarkower of counsel), for respondent.


Law Offices of Andrew Park, P.C., New York, NY (Jusun Yook of counsel), for appellant.

Jennifer S. Adams, Yonkers, NY (Michael A. Zarkower of counsel), for respondent.

MARK C. DILLON, J.P., CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, WILLIAM G. FORD, DEBORAH A. DOWLING, JJ.

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for supplemental uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits, Seng Jin Jang appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Ulysses B. Leverett, J.), entered February 28, 2020. The order denied Seng Jin Jang's motion for leave to renew and reargue his opposition to the petition, which, after a framed-issue hearing, had been granted in an order of the same court entered October 23, 2019.

ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

It is the obligation of the appellant to assemble a proper record on appeal (see Lee v Barnett, 134 A.D.3d 908, 910; 425 E. 26th St. Owners Corp. v Beaton, 128 A.D.3d 766, 767). An appellant's record must contain all of the relevant papers that were before the Supreme Court (see CPLR 5526; Aurora Indus., Inc. v Halwani, 102 A.D.3d 900, 901; Fernald v Vinci, 13 A.D.3d 333). Here, the record compiled by the appellant does not include the transcript of the framed-issue hearing or the majority of the papers submitted in support of, and in opposition to, the petition to permanently stay arbitration of the appellant's claim for supplemental uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits. Therefore, the record is inadequate to allow this Court to render an informed decision pertaining to the February 28, 2020 order. Accordingly, dismissal of the appeal is the appropriate disposition (see Eleven Stars, LLC v Central Baptist Church, 206 A.D.3d 884; 425 E. 26th St. Owners Corp. v Beaton, 128 A.D.3d at 767; Aurora Indus., Inc. v Halwani, 102 A.D.3d at 901).

DILLON, J.P., CHAMBERS, FORD and DOWLING, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Progressive Specialty Ins. Co. v. Seng Jin Jang

Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 7, 2022
2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6930 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
Case details for

Progressive Specialty Ins. Co. v. Seng Jin Jang

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, Respondent, v…

Court:Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 7, 2022

Citations

2022 N.Y. Slip Op. 6930 (N.Y. App. Div. 2022)
177 N.Y.S.3d 905

Citing Cases

Trovato v. Galaxy Sanitation Servs. of N.Y.

The appellant failed to include, among other things, documents that the Supreme Court relied upon in…

Fitzpatrick v. Affairs & Banquets Floral Servs.

On appeal, the record relied upon by the plaintiff does not include various papers relied upon by the…