Opinion
No. 1D18-1351
08-24-2018
PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NEUROLOGY PARTNERS, P.A., d/b/a EMAS Spine & Brain Specialists a/a/o Rachel K. Kopp, Respondent.
Michael C. Clarke, Betsy Ellwanger Gallagher, and Danielle M. Lutyk of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner. Adam Saben of Shuster & Saben, LLC, Jacksonville, for Respondent.
Michael C. Clarke, Betsy Ellwanger Gallagher, and Danielle M. Lutyk of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Tampa, for Petitioner.
Adam Saben of Shuster & Saben, LLC, Jacksonville, for Respondent.
Per Curiam. DISMISSED . See Custer Med. Ctr. v. United Auto Ins. Co. , 62 So.3d 1086, 1093 (Fla. 2010) (emphasizing that "certiorari cannot be used to grant a second appeal to correct the existence of mere legal error" and explaining that "a circuit court appellate decision made according to the forms of law and the rules prescribed for rendering it, although it may be erroneous in its conclusion as to what the law is as applied to facts, is not a departure from the essential requirements of law remediable by certiorari")(emphasis in original); State Farm Auto. Ins. Co. v. CC Chiropractic, LLC, 245 So.3d 755, 757 (Fla. 4th DCA 2018) (discussing the limitations on second-tier certiorari review and noting that "[a] denial of discretionary second-tier certiorari review should not be construed to mean that we approve of the underlying decisions").
Wetherell, Bilbrey, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.