From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Daniel v. United States District Court, Eastern Dist. of California

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2352 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2352 JAM GGH P.

February 3, 2011


ORDER


This case is pending a recommendation of summary dismissal with prejudice as patently frivolous. Nevertheless, despite this and the court's prior denial of his request for an extension of time to, inter alia, obtain court transcripts of a November 5, 2004Marsden hearing held in "juvenile court" before a state court judge, once again asks for an extension of time to obtain the sealed records. The request will be denied once again. The Clerk of the Court will be directed to disregard any further requests for extension of time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's January 26, 2011 second motion for an extension of time (Docket No. 12) is denied; and

2. The Clerk of the Court is directed to disregard any further requests for extension of time from plaintiff.

DATED: February 3, 2011


Summaries of

Daniel v. United States District Court, Eastern Dist. of California

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 3, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2352 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2011)
Case details for

Daniel v. United States District Court, Eastern Dist. of California

Case Details

Full title:JERRY DANIEL PROFFITT, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, EASTERN…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 3, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2352 JAM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 3, 2011)