From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proffitt v. Subia

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 26, 2007
2:06-cv-2143-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2007)

Opinion

2:06-cv-2143-GEB-GGH-P.

September 26, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On August 6, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 6, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the statute of limitations pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), filed on November 29, 2006, is granted, and this case is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Proffitt v. Subia

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 26, 2007
2:06-cv-2143-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2007)
Case details for

Proffitt v. Subia

Case Details

Full title:JERRY DANIEL PROFFITT, Petitioner, v. RICH SUBIA, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 26, 2007

Citations

2:06-cv-2143-GEB-GGH-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 26, 2007)