Proffitt v. Cornuke

Full title: KATHRYN L. PROFFITT, Plaintiff, v. BOB CORNUKE, an individual, B.A.S.E…

Court: United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Mar 24, 2006

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00810-JLK-BNB (D. Colo. Mar. 24, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 03-cv-00810-JLK-BNB.

March 24, 2006

ORDER

BOYD BOLAND, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before me on The Cornuke Defendants' Motion to Strike Exhibits A-D and F-M to Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration or Alternatively to Place This Matter Under Seal [Doc. # 141, filed 2/9/06] (the "Motion to Strike"). That motion is DENIED as moot.

The Motion to Strike seeks an order striking exhibits attached to a motion for reconsideration. The district judge recently clarified the status of the case. Order Clarifying Pendency of Certain Motions [Doc. # 170, filed 3/22/06]. Among other things, the district judge made clear that the motion to reconsider was resolved " in its entirety," Order Clarifying at ¶ 1 (original emphasis), and that any additional filings directed at the motion to reconsider "were erroneous." Id.

Based on the Clarifying Order, I conclude that it is unnecessary either to strike or to seal exhibits filed in connection with a response to a motion which has been fully resolved by the district judge. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot.