From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Productivity Store Inc. v. Quanzhou Shanke Tranding Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 30, 2024
2:23-cv-09783-AB-MAR (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-09783-AB-MAR

05-30-2024

Productivity Store Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Quanzhou Shanke Tranding Co., Ltd, Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION (PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 41)

HONORABLE ANDRE BIROTTE JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE.

On March 7, 2024, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Order to Show Cause required action curing the lack of proof of service and Plaintiff's, a corporation, lack of counsel by May 7, 2024. No response has been filed with the Court indicating proof of service or that Plaintiff has retained counsel.

IT IS THERFORE ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, pursuant to Local Rule 41 for lack of prosecution and for failure to comply with Court orders.


Summaries of

Productivity Store Inc. v. Quanzhou Shanke Tranding Co.

United States District Court, Central District of California
May 30, 2024
2:23-cv-09783-AB-MAR (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2024)
Case details for

Productivity Store Inc. v. Quanzhou Shanke Tranding Co.

Case Details

Full title:Productivity Store Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Quanzhou…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: May 30, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-09783-AB-MAR (C.D. Cal. May. 30, 2024)