Opinion
2:20-CV-02035-JAD-NJK
08-04-2022
ProDox, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company, Plaintiff, v. Professional Document Services, Inc. d/b/a ProDoc-Kytel, a California Corporation Defendant.
BLAKELY LAW GROUP BRENT H. BLAKELY HONE LAW ERIC D. HONE JOEL Z. SCHWARZ ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC. WEIDE & MILLER, LTD. F. CHRISTOPHER AUSTIN LAW OFFICE OF LANCE C. VENABLE, PLLC LANCE C. VENABLE (PRO HAC VICE) ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PRODOX,LLC
BLAKELY LAW GROUP BRENT H. BLAKELY HONE LAW ERIC D. HONE JOEL Z. SCHWARZ ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT PROFESSIONAL DOCUMENT SERVICES, INC.
WEIDE & MILLER, LTD. F. CHRISTOPHER AUSTIN LAW OFFICE OF LANCE C. VENABLE, PLLC LANCE C. VENABLE (PRO HAC VICE) ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF PRODOX,LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO CALCULATE EXPENSES (ECF 96) (FIRST REQUEST)
Plaintiff ProDox, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Professional Document Services, Inc., dba ProDoc-Kytel (“Defendant”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby jointly stipulate pursuant to LR IA 6-1 to extend the deadline for Plaintiff to file a reply in support of its Motion to Calculate Expenses (ECF 96/110) from August 3, 2022, to August 16, 2022. This is the first request to extend this deadline.
The undersigned counsel was tasked by Plaintiff to prepare the reply that is the subject of this stipulation. Plaintiff is seeking this deadline because commencing on August 1, 2022, and continuing through August 10, 2022, the undersigned counsel has been and will be required to attend to an emergency injunction motion filed against another client in a case pending in the Western District for the Federal District of Washington, where the undersigned counsel is the only attorney substantively representing that client in a complex copyright infringement action. This WAWD emergency practice has precluded counsel from preparing the reply that is the subject of this stipulation and will prevent counsel from doing so until after August 10th. Absent the stipulated extension, therefore, Plaintiff will be prejudiced by not having the ability to have counsel represent Plaintiff in the preparation of the subject reply.
Defendant has agreed to this extension without waiver of its argument, as set forth in its Response, that Plaintiff's Motion to Calculate Expenses was untimely.
IT IS SO ORDERED