From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proctor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 5, 1976
229 S.E.2d 675 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)

Opinion

52573.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 7, 1976.

DECIDED OCTOBER 5, 1976.

Escape. Liberty Superior Court. Before Judge Harvey.

Gary A. Sinrich, for appellant.

John W. Underwood, District Attorney, Dupont K. Cheney, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.


The defendant was convicted of escape. He appeals the judgment of conviction.

The evidence shows that the defendant was arrested on two counts of burglary and was confined in the county jail. The defendant admitted having left the jail through a rear door. However, he argues that he was not guilty of escape because he felt coerced to leave because he needed to make arrangements to acquire bond. He said that it was necessary for him to make bond so that he could receive medication on a regular basis.

The evidence supported the verdict of guilty. "Coercion is no defense if the person has any reasonable way, other than committing the crime, to escape the threat of harm ... Such questions are for the jury. [Cits.]" Hill v. State, 135 Ga. App. 766, 767 ( 219 S.E.2d 18). The jury would have been justified in finding that the defendant had other means to obtain his medication other than escape.

Judgment affirmed. Marshall and McMurray, JJ., concur.


SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 7, 1976 — DECIDED OCTOBER 5, 1976.


Summaries of

Proctor v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
Oct 5, 1976
229 S.E.2d 675 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
Case details for

Proctor v. State

Case Details

Full title:PROCTOR v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: Oct 5, 1976

Citations

229 S.E.2d 675 (Ga. Ct. App. 1976)
229 S.E.2d 675

Citing Cases

Vowell v. State

On the other hand, there was considerable evidence — e.g., the fact that appellant had had no cellmate from…

Chambers v. State

Even giving full credence to the testimony, such threats had to relate to apprehension of future injury,…