From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Proctor v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 7, 2000
25 S.W.3d 413 (Ark. 2000)

Opinion

CR 00-779

September 7, 2000

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK — GOOD CAUSE FOR GRANTING. — An admission by an attorney for a criminal defendant that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part is good cause to grant a motion for rule on the clerk.

Motion for Rule on the Clerk; granted.

William C. McArthur, for appellant.

No response.


Julian Robert Proctor, by his attorney, has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney, William C. McArthur, admits in his motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

[1] The motion for rule on the clerk is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.


Summaries of

Proctor v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Sep 7, 2000
25 S.W.3d 413 (Ark. 2000)
Case details for

Proctor v. State

Case Details

Full title:JULIAN ROBERT PROCTOR, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF ARKANSAS, APPELLEE

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Sep 7, 2000

Citations

25 S.W.3d 413 (Ark. 2000)
25 S.W.3d 413